Acquired Angioedema in Selected Neoplastic Diseases.

Background and Objectives. Acquired angioedema is a relatively common revelation accompanying some diseases such as autoimmune or cancer. The study aimed to assess the incidence of one subtype of angioedema-C1-INH-AAE (acquired angioedema with C1 inhibitor deficiency). Material and methods. The study was retrospective and based on 1 312 patients with a final diagnosis of breast cancer, colorectal cancer, or lung cancer: 723 women and 589 men with a mean age of 58.2 ± 13.5 years. The cancer diagnosis according to the ICD (International Classification of Diseases)-10 code, medical history including TNM (Tumour, Node, Metastasis) staging, histopathology, and assessment of the occurrence of C1-INH-AAE angioedema were analysed. Results. C1-INH-AAE occurred more often in patients with cancer than in the control group, as follows: 327 (29%) vs. 53 (6%) for p < 0.05. C1-INH-AAEs were observed most often in the group of patients diagnosed with breast cancer compared to colorectal and lung groups: 197 (37%) vs. 108 (26%) vs. 22 (16%) (p < 0.05). A higher incidence of C1-INH-AAE was observed in the early stages of breast cancer. However, there was no relationship between the occurrence of C1-INH-AAE and the BRCA1 (Breast Cancer gene 1)/BRCA2 (Breast Cancer gene 2) mutation or histopathological types of breast cancer. Conclusion. Angioedema type C1-INH-AAE occurs more often in patients with selected neoplastic diseases, especially in the early stages of breast cancer.

Acquired Angioedema with C1 Inhibitor Deficiency: Occurrence, Clinical Features, and Management: A Nationwide Retrospective Study in the Czech Republic Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Acquired angioedema with C1 inhibitor deficiency (AAE-C1-INH) is rare but a potentially life-threatening disease. There are no official prevalence data, nor approved therapies for this condition. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to collect and analyze clinical data on patients with AAE-C1-INH in the Czech Republic. METHODS: We have conducted a retrospective analysis of AAE-C1-INH patients from Czech referral centers for the treatment of hereditary angioedema with C1 inhibitor deficiency. The inclusion criteria involved recurrent episodes of angioedema with the first manifestation at or after the age of 40, negative family history of angioedema, and C1 inhibitor function 50% or less. RESULTS: A total of 14 patients (7 males and 7 females) met the inclusion criteria for AAE-C1-INH. The median age of the symptom onset was 59.5 years, and the median diagnosis delay was 1 year. The most common clinical manifestation was facial edema (100%) and upper airway swelling (85.7%). All patients responded to the acute attack treatment with icatibant and plasma-derived or recombinant C1 inhibitor concentrate. Lymphoid malignancy was identified in 9 patients (64%), monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance in 3 (21%), and in 1 patient autoimmune disease (ulcerative colitis) was considered causative (7%). We were not able to identify any underlying disease only in 1 patient (7%). In 6 of 7 patients (86%) treated for lymphoma, either a reduction in the frequency of angioedema attacks or both angioedema symptoms' disappearance and complement parameter normalization was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of AAE-C1-INH in the Czech Republic is about 1:760,000. This rare condition occurs in approximately 8% of the patients with angioedema with C1 inhibitor deficiency. AAE-C1-INH is strongly associated with lymphoproliferative disorders, and treating these conditions may improve the control of angioedema symptoms.

[Acquired angioedema due to C1-inhibitor deficiency: CREAK recommendations for diagnosis and treatment]. / Angiœdèmes par déficit acquis en C1-inhibiteur : recommandations du CREAK pour le diagnostic et la prise en charge.

Acquired angioedema with C1-inhibitor deficiency is a rare and peculiar entity belonging to the spectrum of bradykinin angioedemas. It usually occurs in subjects over 60 years old, and is mostly associated with a B-cell lymphoid hemopathy or a monoclonal gammopathy. The diagnosis relies on at least one angioedema episode, lasting more than 24 h, and on the decrease of functional C1-inhibitor. Low C1q is observed in 90% of patients, and an anti C1-inhibitor antibody is found in 50% of patients. The treatment of severe attacks relies on icatibant or C1-inhibitor perfusions. Long term prophylaxis in patients with frequent attacks requires treatment of the associated hemopathy if so. In case of idiopathic angioedema, tranexamic acid and danazol may be used, provided that there is-no thrombophilia; as well as rituximab as second-line treatment. Inhibitors of kallikrein still need to be evaluated in this therapeutic indication.

Real-world cohort study of adult and pediatric patients treated for hereditary angioedema in the United States.

Background: There is limited real-world evidence on hereditary angioedema (HAE) patient characteristics and health-care resource utilization (HCRU); in addition, pediatric patients have been described in small cohorts. Objective: To describe patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and HCRU among adult and pediatric patients treated for HAE in a large U.S. cohort. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used an administrative claims data base (January 2006 to September 2015). Eligible patients with either ≥1 pharmacy claim for HAE-indicated therapies (C1 inhibitors, ecallantide, icatibant) or ≥2 medical claims with codes associated with HAE (per medical billing codes), and ≥1 claim for androgens, fresh frozen plasma, tranexamic acid, or ε-aminocaproic acid formed a "treated cohort." Three nonexclusive treated cohorts were assessed: overall, pediatric, and HCRU (≥2 years of continuous enrollment during 2010-2015). Results: Overall, 1429 patients received treatment (mean ± standard deviation [SD] age, 38.8 ±15.7 years; 62.4% female patients; mean ± SD Charlson Comorbidity Index of 1.4 ± 2.4). Common comorbidities were allergy or anaphylaxis (51.4%) and anxiety or depression (35.8%). Diagnoses indicative of HAE attacks included swelling and/or angioedema (78.5%), abdominal pain (55.6%), and asphyxiation (27.2%). Use of HAE-indicated medication rose between 2006 and 2015 to 81.8%, whereas androgen use declined (from 91.5% to 24.9%). Similar trends were observed in the pediatric treated cohort (n = 143). In the HCRU treated cohort (n = 538), HAE-related claims for emergency department and inpatient admissions were observed for 36.6% and 22.3% of patients, respectively. Conclusion: In a large U.S. cohort of adult and pediatric patients who received treatments indicated or used for HAE, common comorbidities and trends in resource use denoted the substantial burden of attacks, which reflected a continued need that recently approved long-term prophylactic treatments may help to address.

Treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization among patients with hereditary angioedema in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Real-world data on usage and associated outcomes with hereditary angioedema (HAE)-specific medications introduced to the United States (US) market since 2009 are very limited. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate real-world treatment patterns of HAE-specific medications in the US and to assess their impact on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU). This analysis used IMS PharMetrics PlusTM database records (2006-2014) of patients with HAE, ≥1 insurance claim for an HAE-specific medication, and continuous insurance enrollment for ≥3 months following the first HAE prescription claim. RESULTS: Of 631 total patients, 434 (68.8%) reported C1-INH(IV) use; 396 (62.8%) reported using ecallantide and/or icatibant. There were 306 episodes of prophylactic use of C1-INH(IV) (defined by continuous refills averaging ≥1500 IU/week for ≥13 weeks) in 155 patients; use of ≥1 on-demand rescue medication was implicated during 53% (163/306) of those episodes. Sixty-eight (20.2%) of 336 C1-INH(IV) users eligible for the HCRU analysis were hospitalized at least once, and 191 (56.8%) visited the emergency department (ED). Eighteen patients (5.4%) had a central venous access device (CVAD); of these, 5 (27.7%) required hospitalization and 14 (77.7%) had an ED visit. The adjusted relative risk of hospitalization and/or ED visits for patients with a CVAD was 2.6 (95% CI: 0.17, 39.23) compared to C1-INH(IV) users without a CVAD. CONCLUSIONS: Despite widespread availability of modern HAE medications in the US, we identified a subset of patients requiring long-term prophylaxis who continue to be burdened by frequent rescue medication usage and/or complications related to the use of CVADs for intravenous HAE medication.

The Incidence and Frequency of Various Causes of Angioedema in Emergency Medicine.

OBJECTIVE: Angioedema (AE) is a potentially life-threatening event. We investigated the etiology of AE, with the emphasis on bradykinininduced angioedema treatment in emergency medicine. METHODS: The retrospective study included 237 patients with AE, who were examined and treated in two hospitals (group A and B) in Croatia from 2009 to 2016. The location and duration of AE, data about chronic diseases and treatment, potential causative agents (food, drugs, insect bites and chemicals), physical examination data and the subsequent treatment were analyzed. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference regarding age or comorbidities but there was a statistically significant difference in etiology between the groups (Chi-square, P=0.03). Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blocker induced AE was the main cause of emergency attendance in group A (37.5%) and among the leading causes in group B (18.8%). Bradykinin-induced AE (hereditary angioedema (HAE) and RAAS-AE) were the leading causes in a total of 75 (31.5%) patients. RAAS-AE was treated with glucocorticoids and antihistamines. HAE attacks in both groups (2/7 patients, 1.5/6%) were treated with specific therapy. Other causes of AE in groups A/B were insect bites (15/23 patients, 13.5/20%), use of antibiotics/analgetics (11/17 patients, 9/15%), gastroesophageal reflux disease (10/11 patients, 8/9%), neoplasms (5/6 patients, 4/5%) and idiopatic (32/31 patients, 26.5/26%). 21% of patients were hospitalized. CONCLUSION: Bradykinin-mediated AE was the main cause of emergency attendance associated with AE. Advances in the treatment of HAE, with case reports of patients with RAAS-AE treated with C1 esterase inhibitor concentrate or bradykinin receptor antagonist, may prove to be a new, reliable and efficacious therapy option.

Acquired C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency in lymphomas: prevalence, symptoms, and response to treatment.

We retrospectively studied the prevalence of C1 esterase inhibitor (C1 INH) deficiency in 131 patients with various lymphomas. We determined C1 INH activity, C1 INH antigen, and C4 concentration at diagnosis and after chemotherapy. In follicular lymphoma (FL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) consecutive patients were studied. In these entities, the prevalence of C1 INH deficiency was 10.2% in DLBCL, 4.1% in CLL, and 0% in FL and Hodgkin lymphoma. In indolent lymphomas, we identified only single cases of C1 INH deficiency, predominantly in splenic marginal zone lymphomas (SMZL) (four cases). Only three patients were symptomatic while the majority (11 cases) was asymptomatic. In DLBCL patients who were successfully treated with chemotherapy, complete normalization of C1 INH activity and C4 was observed. In contrast, C1 INH deficiency remained in SMZL patients after splenectomy. We conclude that C1 INH deficiency in lymphomas is frequently asymptomatic and responsive to immunochemotherapy.

Epidemiology of angioedema without wheals in an allergy and immunology center

We describe the diagnostic epidemiology, the clinical course, the family history and the response to treatment of patients with angioedema without wheals (AWW) at an Allergy and Immunology Clinical Center. We reviewed the case records of all patients at our office from January 1997 to April 2013. We recorded sex, age, age at onset of symptoms, family history of angioedema, number of visits to the office, type of angioedema, and response to treatment from those patients with angioedema without wheals. We classified angioedema according to its pathophysiology. We also describe those patients with angioedema mimics. From a total of 17 823 new patients, 303 had a presumptive diagnosis of angioedema without wheals. Twenty-three patients had an angioedema mimic. Forty percent were male and 60% were female. Average age at first visit was 40.6. Average number of visits was 2.4. Fifty-seven patients referred a family history. We attributed idiopathic angioedema to 55.7% of patients, 24.3% were drug related, 15.7% were due to C1 inhibitor deficiency, 2.1% were drug related + idiopathic angioedema, 1.4% were type III and 0.7% had exercise-induced angioedema. Ninety six percent of 53 evaluable idiopathic angioedema patients referred a benefit with anti-histamine therapy. AWW was a rare cause of consultation. Most of our patients had anti H1 responsive idiopathic angioedema and none had allergic angioedema. Women cases prevailed over men´s. Family history and average age of onset of symptoms were different among the different types of angioedema.

Describimos la epidemiología, historia clínica, antecedentes familiares y respuesta al tratamiento de los pacientes consultando por angioedema sin urticaria en nuestra clínica especializada en Alergia e Inmunología. Revisamos retrospectivamente todas las historias clínicas de nuestro consultorio entre enero de 1997 y abril de 2013. Seleccionamos aquellos pacientes que habían consultado por angioedema sin urticaria y registramos el sexo, edad, edad de comienzo de síntomas, antecedentes familiares de angioedema, número de consultas, tipo de angioedema y respuesta al tratamiento. Clasificamos el angioedema de acuerdo a su fisiopatología. Describimos también los diagnósticos diferenciales que encontramos. De un total de 17 823 pacientes, 303 consultaron por angioedema sin ronchas. Veintitrés presentaban un diagnóstico alternativo. El 40% eran hombres y el 60% mujeres. La edad promedio de la primera visita fue 40.6 años. El promedio de consultas fue 2.4. Cincuenta y siete refirieron antecedentes familiares. El 55.7% fue clasificado como angioedema idiopático, el 24.3% secundario a drogas, el 15.7% secundario a deficiencia del inhibidor C1, 2.1% por drogas + idiopático, 1.4% angioedema tipo III y 0.71% asociado al ejercicio. Noventa y seis por ciento de 53 pacientes evaluables con angioedema idiopático se beneficiaron con antihistamínicos. El angioedema sin urticaria fue una causa rara de consultas. Las mujeres prevalecieron sobre los hombres. Los antecedentes familiares y la edad de comienzo de síntomas variaron de acuerdo al tipo de angioedema.

Assessment of hereditary angioedema treatment risks.

Therapies used for hereditary angioedema (HAE) have been associated with adverse events to include thrombosis, emboli, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), exacerbation of attacks, and anaphylaxis. It is difficult to determine incidence of these adverse events from the literature. For this reason we surveyed multiple HAE physicians to determine the risk associated with therapies used in HAE. This study was designed to determine by survey the risk of thrombosis associated with C1-inhibitor (C1-INH), worsening attacks with fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and carcinoma secondary to androgens (mainly danazol). An Internet-based survey was sent to physicians internationally who treat patients with HAE. The survey queried physicians about their observations while treating HAE. Of the 66 physicians who participated in the survey, 37 had patients (856 patients) who were on C1-INH but only 4 (total of 5 patients) had patients on C1-INH who experienced an thromboembolic episode. Of the 17 patients on C1 esterase inhibitor and an indwelling catheter, 3 experienced an embolic, thrombosis, or thromboembolic event. The likelihood of an abnormal event when a patient is on a C1-INH is 5/856 (0.6%), compared with 3/17 (18%) with a central catheter. The incidence of HCC is rare. The incidence of adverse effects to FFP is greater than the literature suggests. Patients with HAE should avoid indwelling catheters, use FFP only when other therapies are unavailable, and use androgens with caution. Most importantly, adverse events to drugs should be reported so that the true incidence of adverse events can be determined.

Recent advances in the management of hereditary angioedema.

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic condition that manifests as painful and potentially life-threatening episodic attacks of cutaneous and submucosal swelling. It results from functional deficiency of C1 inhibitor (C1 INH), which is a regulator of the complement, fibrinolytic, kinin (contact), and coagulation systems. In patients with HAE, the low plasma concentration of functional C1 INH leads to overactivation of the kinin cascade and local release of bradykinin. Bradykinin is responsible for the pain, vascular permeability changes, and edema associated with HAE. Until recently, therapeutic options for HAE have been very limited. Many new therapies have emerged, however, such as C1 INH replacement drugs and medications aimed at components of the contact system (eg, plasma kallikrein inhibitor and bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist). The authors review current and novel treatments for patients with HAE.

An update on hereditary angioedema.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review and update the management and understanding of hereditary angioedema (HAE), while integrating insights into pediatric subtleties that exist in practice. RECENT FINDINGS: Major advances have recently been made in HAE treatment. Ecallantide (a kallikrein inhibitor approved for use in the United States in December 2009) and icatibant (a selective bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist approved for use in the United States in August 2011) represent novel subcutaneous therapies for acute HAE exacerbations. Recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor (C1INH) serves as a promising future alternative to current mainstay acute and prophylactic treatment with plasma-derived C1INH. Recent guidelines have outlined new algorithms for short-term and long-term prophylaxis against HAE exacerbations. SUMMARY: The evolving standard of care for HAE management involves not only treatment of acute exacerbations but also individualized patient preference-sensitive short-term and long-term prophylaxis. Updated international consensus guidelines provide useful protocols, whereas recent clinical reviews have raised awareness of HAE. Further advances will likely focus on improving patient access to convenient acute and prophylactic treatment with C1INH.

Diagnosis and treatment of hereditary angioedema.

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder affecting approximately 1 in 50000 persons. It causes frequent attacks of non-pitting, non-pruritic edema without urticaria, usually of the skin of the extremities, gastrointestinal tract, and upper airways. Gastrointestinal attacks may cause severe pain, and attacks in the laryngeal region may lead to asphyxiation and death. HAE usually begins in childhood or adolescence and persists throughout life. The majority of HAE cases are caused by mutations that result in low levels of functional C1-inhibitor (C1-INH), a serine protease inhibitor that plays regulatory roles in the contact, complement, and fibrinolytic systems. Low C1-INH function results in overproduction of bradykinin, the primary cause of HAE symptoms. Type I HAE is characterized by low levels of functional C1-INH, whereas type II HAE is characterized by normal levels of dysfunctional C1-INH. A third type of HAE has a similar presentation, but is not due to C1-INH deficiency or impairment. Some patients with type III HAE carry mutations in the coagulation factor XII gene that do not alter factor XII plasma levels but markedly increase its activity. HAE is often undiagnosed or misdiagnosed, sometimes leading to inappropriate treatment that may include surgery. HAE should be suspected in any patient who presents with repeated attacks of cutaneous edema without urticaria or recurrent unexplained abdominal pain. Diagnosis requires laboratory testing of complement levels. HAE requires disease-specific treatment with agents that increase functional C1-INH levels and/or reduce the production or activity of bradykinin. These treatments include C1-INH concentrates, icatibant, ecallantide, and attenuated androgens. HAE severely reduces patients' quality of life, which makes supportive care an essential part of the treatment program.

Progress in the emergency management of hereditary angioedema: focus on new treatment options in the United States.

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare disorder generally caused by a deficit in the activity of C1-esterase inhibitor (C1-INH). Symptoms manifest as recurrent episodes of nonallergic, nonpruritic, and nonpitting edema. Attacks commonly occur on the extremities, trunk, genitalia, abdomen, or head and neck--the latter 2 locations are associated with the greatest morbidity and mortality. In the United States, there has been a considerable void in effective HAE treatments and emergency management guidelines. Clinical outcomes using agents such as fresh-frozen plasma, attenuated androgens (danazol), or plasmin inhibitors (aminocaproic acid) have not been ideal. Recent years have seen progress with US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of several products for acute HAE treatment. Plasma concentrate of C1-INH has long been the treatment of choice in many parts of the world, and a pasteurized formula received FDA approval in October 2009 for treating attacks. Ecallantide, a plasma kallikrein inhibitor, and icatibant, a bradykinin receptor antagonist, were approved in December 2009 and August 2011, respectively, for treatment of acute attacks. A recombinant C1-INH product is in late development stages for treating acute attacks. These new treatments provide symptom relief within hours, dramatically shorten attack duration, and decrease mortality from airway compromise. For the first time, US physicians have rapid-acting and highly effective treatments for managing acute HAE attacks.

New treatment options for acute edema attacks caused by hereditary angioedema.

PURPOSE: New treatment options for acute edema attacks caused by hereditary angioedema (HAE) are reviewed. SUMMARY: HAE is characterized by mutations in the C1 inhibitor gene leading to either a reduced expression of C1 inhibitor in the plasma or expression of a functionally impaired C1 inhibitor. HAE is classified into two major types based on the cause of the C1 inhibitor deficiency. Type I HAE is defined by a reduced expression of C1 inhibitor in the plasma, whereas type II HAE is characterized by the expression of a dysfunctional C1 inhibitor protein. Clinical data were reviewed for C1 inhibitor, ecallantide, and icatibant in the treatment of acute edema attacks caused by HAE. C1 inhibitor leads to a faster onset of edema relief and is effective in decreasing the duration of edema. Dosing strategies include fixed dosing and weight-based dosing. Optimal dosing strategies have not been established, but fixed dosing (500-1000 units) or 20 units/kg has been effective in clinical trials and reports. No comparative trials suggest that one strategy is superior to another; however, the approved labeling for acute treatment is based on weight. Ecallantide is also efficacious for treating acute episodes; however, the available evidence is limited to a single published trial. Icatibant has shown variable effects in two trials with placebo and active controls. CONCLUSION: In patients with HAE, most edema episodes only involve the skin and gastrointestinal tract, though airway obstruction caused by laryngeal angioedema is the most common cause of death. I.V. C1 inhibitor should be considered first-line treatment for acute edema attacks because of its fast onset of action and effectiveness, though it is not clear whether fixed or weight-based dosing is preferred. Ecallantide can be considered as a second-line treatment option.

Type III hereditary angio-oedema: clinical and biological features in a French cohort.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary angio-oedema (HAE) has been associated with C1inhibitor deficiency. The first cases of type III HAE were described in patients with normal C1Inh antigenic protein level and function and normal C4 levels in 2000. This finding has been reported mostly in women with a family history and may be influenced by exogenous oestrogen exposure. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this article is to describe the clinical, biological and genetic characteristics of a French population suffering from type III HAE. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of angio-oedema (AE) cases seen in the National Reference Centre of AE between 2000 and 2009. RESULTS: We found 26 patients (from 15 unrelated families) with type III HAE. All but four were women and presented with typical AE attacks, exacerbated by pregnancy or oral contraceptives containing oestrogens (OC). We also found that 54.5% of women were worsened with oestrogen and 23% were oestrogen dependent. All patients improved on long-term prophylactic tranexamic acid treatment; some acute attacks improved with C1Inh concentrate infusion. All of the patients had normal C1Inh and C4 levels. C1Inh function was also normal, except in women receiving OC or during a pregnancy: transient, moderately low levels (32-74% of the normal range) were found in 18 patients tested (67%). No SERPING1 gene mutation was found. Six patients from three unrelated families were heterozygous for an F12 gene variant. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of type III HAE should be based on clinical (typical attacks, often hormonally influenced), laboratory (normal C1Inh antigenic protein) and genetic (F12 gene mutation) evidence.

When is prophylaxis for hereditary angioedema necessary?

OBJECTIVE: To determine when newer agents, such as C1 esterase inhibitor protein (C1-INH), should be considered as prophylaxis to decrease hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks as an alternative to androgens, which have significant adverse events. DATA SOURCES: A literature review (PubMed, Google, and Ovid), guideline review, expert panel meeting, and group discussion were performed to decide when prophylaxis is indicated. STUDY SELECTION: Articles addressing HAE therapy published in the peer-reviewed literature were selected. RESULTS: The retrieved studies demonstrate that C1-INH is effective and that the half-life makes it attractive for prophylactic use. The short half-lives of ecallantide, icatibant, and recombinant human C1-INH limit their use as prophylactic agents. Patients with severe anxiety, more than 1 attack per month, rapid progression of attacks, limited access to health care, more than 10 days lost from work or school per year, previous laryngeal swelling, more than 3 emergency department visits per year, more than 1 hospitalization per year, previous intubation, previous intensive care unit care, significant compromise in quality of life, or narcotic dependency should be considered for androgen or C1-INH prophylaxis therapy. CONCLUSION: Patients with HAE with frequent attacks, severe attacks, past laryngeal attacks, excessive loss of work or school, significant anxiety, and poor quality of life should be considered for C1-INH prophylaxis, especially those who fail, are intolerant of, have adverse reactions to, or are not candidates for androgen therapy.